Apotheosis Contelligence Increase Cosmic Frontier Hedonism & Fun Dreams & Psi Life Extension & Immortality Spaceship Earth
  Home      Forums      Library      Media      Gallery      Glossary      Links

February 23, 2005

All About Power, and the Three Ways to Topple It

Thanks to Bird on the Moon, I came across this rare and brilliant piece that expresses all that I try to, only much better. The article is by Dave Pollard. Below I've tried to excerpt some of the most salient points:

Part 1: All About Power, and the Three Ways to Topple It (Part 1):

Most of what has been written about change -- by political theorists as well as business gurus -- is about revolutionary change. It is about creating a sense of popular urgency for change. Writers on social and business innovation, by contrast, are (perhaps subconsciously) writing about change that incapacitates. Clay Christensen speaks candidly about 'disruptive innovation', the kind that catches successful businesses off guard, just like a virus or undetected parasite, and brings it to its knees. A huge amount of money and energy is being spent these days -- on so-called 'anti-terrorist' programs, on physical and computer security, on fighting file-sharing, on patenting anything even vaguely innovative to prevent a competitor bringing it to market, on the search for vaccines and cures for AIDS, BSE, Avian Flu etc., on anti-fraud measures like Sarbanes-Oxley -- all designed to fight incapacitating, rather than popular, revolutionary, enemies. Actions that are aimed to incapacitate are called guerrilla (meaning 'little war') actions. Since the Vietnam war debacle in the 1960s the very term has struck fear in the hearts of the power elite, because they know that, in today's heavily concentrated, centralized, interconnected, 'grid-locked' society, this is where they are most vulnerable, most powerless to defend themselves.

Some non-violent ways we can incapacitate the power elite, using this 4-step process:

  1. Identify the vulnerabilities: Fragility, overconcentration, ignorance, arrogance, lack of diversity, centralization, lack of redundancy, popular disgust, anxiety, dissatisfaction or apprehension, ill-preparedness, lack of agility, overcomplexity (left hand doesn't know what the right is doing), lack of imagination and creativity, etc.
  2. Acquire resources stealthily: Put together what you need without letting your target know you're doing so, or even what you are capable of doing with them.
  3. Develop solutions that exploit the vulnerabilities.
  4. Rigorously assess the likelihood of those solutions working effectively (incapacitating the incumbent power), and deploy only the high-probability solutions, quickly, before the incumbents have time to react and defend themselves.

and introduce 'innovations' that make our world a better place to live. The focus will be on new technology, new infrastructure, new models and new processes that replace the vulnerable ones that are the causes of so many of today's global problems -- and ensuring that these replacements are Open Source, and stay in the hands of all the world's people.

Part Two - Free Information, Freedom from the Grid, and Peer-to-Peer Bio-Innovation:

In a brilliant and famous Wired interview with Freeman Dyson by Stewart Brand, Dyson identifies "a return to village culture" as the most important opportunity of the 21st century, driven by three technologies: global access to free information, local energy self-sufficiency, and biotech, which together could "gentrify" (bring affluence, population stability and ecological awareness to) the villages. Dyson predicts the "collapse of the market economy" will bring about this opportunity, in 'rising from the ashes' style. He's a great believer in technology, and impatient with and pessimistic about our political and economic systems, but he has faith in human ingenuity, and the power of multiple, coordinated small-scale experiments.

But suppose if, instead of waiting for the collapse of the market economy and the crumbling of the power elite, we brought about that collapse, guerrilla-style,  by making information free, by making local communities energy self-sufficient, and by taking the lead in biotech away from government and corporatists (the power elite) by working collaboratively, using the Power of Many, Open Source, unconstrained by corporate allegiance, patents and 'shareholder expectations'?

The first part of this guerrilla undermining of the corporatist-controlled 'market' economy -- the 'making free' of information -- is already underway. The war for free information between corporatists and people is occurring on multiple fronts: The attempt by large corporations to patent everything so it cannot be used by the people without paying an exorbitant and prohibitive fee; the attempt by large corporations to ban file-sharing without first paying extortion to the intellectual property 'owner' (little of which actually goes to the artist); the attempt to make more of the information on the Internet 'pay for itself'. But the people are winning this guerrilla war.

Related Entries

The Coming Liesure Society
Counter Culture 2.0
Left Brain Revenge, Right Brain Liberation, Leisure Society

Posted by paul at February 23, 2005 07:43 PM
Comments

freedom is a personal thing.maybe government is someone else`s idea of freedom.when we are ground down within the mechanism of bureaucracy we don`t have time for anarchy.maybe those in power are afraid of us.there are 6 1/2 billion of us and a few hundred ruling families around the world.but who would run things if we did overthrow "them"?

Posted by: alistair at March 1, 2005 12:11 PM

Howdy Alistair,

I think you are have the mistaken notion that somehow things would no longer work if it wasn't for these hundred ruling families. Nothing could be further from the truth. The global system would hum along just fine without them. As global communications increases, as network intelligence increases, people are extremely resiliant. The overwhelming number of people are actually decent people. Systems of exhange, commerce, barter, networking, intelligence, etc will do fine without ruling families. The only reason they are in power is because they have controlled the system to keep them in power. They are unneccessary, and ironically they know it more than anyone else.

The result would be far from anarchy. It would be a higher level order created by intelligence at the ends empowered by the network. Result: Order without orderers. Look at the Tsunami relief. Although Bush and Clinton came in a week or so after, there was already tremendous amounts of grass roots world support to help these people.

With alternative energies, alternative currency and barter systems, and a re-localizing locus of control back to the communities themselves will empower people to take care of themselves like never before. I could write a book about all of this (I AM writing a book about all of this), so this short explanation will have to do. There are many, MANY resources on the net that support this whole line of thinking. Besides, its inevitable anyway. The transition from centralized power to decentralized higher-order networked intelligence is already in full swing.

Cheers,

Paul

Posted by: Paul Hughes at March 1, 2005 12:39 PM

the transition from central control to re-localisation is a process that is always occuring.there are always those who wish to do things differently.malachi martin was fond of saying that he must criticise the pope even though the pope was infalable(when the college said so).malachi eventially fell down a flight of stairs though.
certainly government it`sself recognises that it must be provincial and civil,as well as federal.
it is a natural part of organisms to rise and fall.a natural part of seasons to wax and wane.a retribalisation of america?the computer certainly helps that trip.

Posted by: alistair at March 2, 2005 07:39 AM